欧美判例翻译(15)

　　[115]Miller,?supra, at 114, 106 S.Ct. 445.
　　[116]Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 575, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985).
　　[117]Ante, at 840.
　　[118]Miller, supra at 113, 106 S.Ct. 445
　　[119]517 U.S., at 388-391, 116 S.Ct. 1384.
　　[120]Miller, 474 U.S., at 114, 106 S.Ct. 445.
　　[121]Id., at 113, 106 S.Ct. 445
　　[122]Ornelas, supra, at 697, 116 S.Ct. 1657; see also Miller, supra, at 116, 106 S.Ct. 445.
　　[123]Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803).
　　[124]Markman, 517 U.S., at 390, 116 S.Ct. 1384.
　　[125]Markman, 517 U.S., at 390, 116 S.Ct. 1384 ; see also Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722, 731, 122 S.Ct. 1831, 152 L.Ed.2d 944 (2002).
　　[126]Ante, at 840 (citing Markman, supra, at 391, 116 S.Ct. 1384; citation omitted).
　　[127]See Markman, supra, at 391, 116 S.Ct. 1384.
　　[128]Ante, at 840.
　　[129]Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 236-237, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009)
　　[130]Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., 572 U.S. ----, ----, 134 S.Ct. 2120, 2124, 189 L.Ed.2d 37 (2014).东方知识产权 See, e.g., Mayo Foundation for Medical Ed. and Research v. United States, 562 U.S. 44, 52-53, 131 S.Ct. 704,178 L.Ed.2d 588 (2011) (并未尊重地区法院的判决而进行审查，在 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources.Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984)的第一步中，一项法规是不明确的);11 Williston ?30:5, at 75 (“确定合同含义是否是模糊的判决属于法院决定的法律问题”).

(作者：柳楠，来源：华东政法大学知识产权)